Choosing between wooden and composite terrace boards depends on budget, maintenance preferences, and longevity needs in Baltic climates. Wooden boards excel in natural aesthetics and lower upfront costs, while composite (WPC) wins for durability and minimal upkeep.
Wooden Terrace Boards: Pros and Cons
Wooden terrace boards deliver authentic grain, warm underfoot feel, and affordability—pressure-impregnated pine costs €16-€40/m², larch €50-€90/m², with thermally modified wood lasting 20+ years without chemicals. They require annual oiling/staining, can crack or gray in 5-7 years without care, and react to moisture in Latvia's freeze-thaw cycles.
Composite Terrace Boards: Pros and Cons
Composite terrace boards (wood fibers + PVC) last 20+ years without rotting, splintering, or insect damage, need no painting, and offer anti-slip surfaces even when wet; prices range €40-€80/m². Drawbacks include higher initial cost, hotter feel in sun, and less "natural" appearance compared to real wood.
Comparison Table
| Aspect | Wooden Boards | Composite (WPC) Boards |
|---|---|---|
| Price (€/m²) | 16-90 (cheaper upfront) | 40-80 (balanced long-term) |
| Lifespan | 5-20 years (with maintenance) | 20+ years |
| Maintenance | Annual oiling/staining | Washing with water |
| Moisture/Insects | Moderate (impregnation helps) | High (no rot, cracking) |
| Look/Feel | Natural, warm | Wood-like, hotter in sun |
| Eco-Friendly | Renewable, but higher resource use | Recycled materials, less waste |
When to Choose Each
Select wood for aesthetics and low initial budget if willing to maintain; choose composite for hassle-free terraces lasting decades, ideal for Latvia's wet climate where WPC outperforms in 80% of cases.
